BASIC CARE AND EARLY TREATMENT AGAINST COVID-19 IN BRAZIL:
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Fluoridation. Public Health Surveillance. Education, Public Health Professional. Health Human Resource Training. Fluoruración. Vigilancia en Salud Pública. Educación en Salud Pública Profesional. Capacitación de Recursos Humanos en Salud. Fluoretação. Vigilância em Saúde Pública. Educação Profissional em Saúde Pública. Capacitação de Recursos Humanos em Saúde

How to Cite

Montenegro de Lima, C. R., & Ribeiro de Moraes, D. . (2024). BASIC CARE AND EARLY TREATMENT AGAINST COVID-19 IN BRAZIL:: DISORGANIZATION OF THE SUS, QUACKERY AND DENIAL. Tempus – Actas De Saúde Coletiva, 15(4), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.18569/tempus.v14i4.2890

Abstract

This article discusses the use of the so-called "early treatment" against Covid-19 during the first year of the pandemic in Brazil. This procedure is analyzed in the context of the crisis in primary care of the Unified Health System - SUS. It is there that the engaged charlatanism emerges, which ignores and despises scientific evidence and good therapeutic practices. The discussion begins with the highlight of the deliberate disorganization of primary care in SUS carried out by the federal government of Jair Bolsonaro. It is during this process that the pandemic arrives. Among the effects of the bolsonarista action is the demobilization of the family health teams. Thus, the guidance of the Ministry of Health focuses only on social isolation and the treatment of serious cases in hospitals and intensive care units. The evolution of the pandemic creates an artificial conflict between health protection and resumption of production. As the pandemic progresses, the primary care gap becomes evident. It is in this space that uses of medicines "out of the package" arise, highlighting chloroquine, azithromycin and ivermectin. It is due that an important portion of the medical corporation and its entities adhere to the Bolsonarist thesis. Finally, Bolsonaro's defense of "early treatment" is included as part of his strategy of political polarization and mobilization of his social base around fraudulent news and the denial of science. Bolsonarist rhetoric has the specific function of neglecting the disease and the need for preventive measures, which contributes to increasing the incidence and lethality.

https://doi.org/10.18569/tempus.v14i4.2890
PDF (Português (Brasil))